Thank you for making me a human being.
Thank you for making me a warrior.
Thank you for my victories and my defeats.
Thank you for my vision...
...and the blindness in which I saw further.
RIP Arthur Penn
RIP Greg Giraldo
Take care of my son here. See that he doesn't go crazy.
Warm Regards,
Erik B. Anderson, the King of Funny Faces
Independence Township, New Jersey
Established 1782
"Nothing becomes funny by being labeled so." -Strunk & White's Elements of Style
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Concept of the Day - September 29, 2010
A double bind is a dilemma in communication in which an individual (or group) receives two or more conflicting messages, with one message negating the other. This creates a situation in which a successful response to one message results in a failed response to the other, so that the person will be automatically wrong regardless of response. The nature of a double bind is that the person cannot confront the inherent dilemma, and therefore cannot resolve it or opt out of the situation.
...the essence of a double bind is two conflicting demands, each on a different logical level, neither of which can be ignored or escaped. This leaves the victim torn both ways, so that whichever demand they try to meet, the other demand cannot be met. "I must do it, but I can't do it" is a typical description of the double bind experience.
For a double bind to be effective, the victim must be unable to confront or resolve the conflict between the demand placed by the primary injunction and that of the secondary injunction. In this sense, the double bind differentiates itself from a simple contradiction to a more inexpressible internal conflict, where the victim really wants to meet the demands of the primary injunction, but fails each time through an inability to address the situation's incompatibility with the demands of the secondary injunction. Thus, victims may express feelings of extreme anxiety in such a situation, as they attempt to fulfil the demands of the primary injunction albeit with obvious contradictions in their actions.
More...
Example: Judge to young man: "Leave that woman alone!", while the man knows the woman will approach and antagonize him to get into trouble.
...the essence of a double bind is two conflicting demands, each on a different logical level, neither of which can be ignored or escaped. This leaves the victim torn both ways, so that whichever demand they try to meet, the other demand cannot be met. "I must do it, but I can't do it" is a typical description of the double bind experience.
For a double bind to be effective, the victim must be unable to confront or resolve the conflict between the demand placed by the primary injunction and that of the secondary injunction. In this sense, the double bind differentiates itself from a simple contradiction to a more inexpressible internal conflict, where the victim really wants to meet the demands of the primary injunction, but fails each time through an inability to address the situation's incompatibility with the demands of the secondary injunction. Thus, victims may express feelings of extreme anxiety in such a situation, as they attempt to fulfil the demands of the primary injunction albeit with obvious contradictions in their actions.
More...
Example: Judge to young man: "Leave that woman alone!", while the man knows the woman will approach and antagonize him to get into trouble.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Two Frogs In a Hole
There were two frogs leaping around in a swamp. Suddenly they fell in a very deep hole. All the frogs gathered and told them that its impossible to get out of this mud-filled hole and that they have to give up.
The first frog tried to jump and jump but he never make it, the rest of the frogs outside the hole kept making him down.
Eventually he gave up and died.
The second frog however keep on jumping and jumping trying to reach the surface, despite the discouragement of the rest of the frog. He finally made it.
The rest of the frogs were amazed and told him why didn't you listen and give up like the other frog? Then he explained that he was deaf. He thought that they were encouraging him to get out. That's why he kept on trying.
The first frog tried to jump and jump but he never make it, the rest of the frogs outside the hole kept making him down.
Eventually he gave up and died.
The second frog however keep on jumping and jumping trying to reach the surface, despite the discouragement of the rest of the frog. He finally made it.
The rest of the frogs were amazed and told him why didn't you listen and give up like the other frog? Then he explained that he was deaf. He thought that they were encouraging him to get out. That's why he kept on trying.
Monday, September 27, 2010
Down By the Water - Open Mic - 9/9/10
Studio of Long Valley
Song: Down by the Water
By: PJ Harvey
Covered by Erik B. Anderson
http://www.tricma.org
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Testimonial
"There is honestly no one I can think of that would be better to play Murdock or Hamlet. I'm not just blowing smoke up your ass because I'm your friend either, I seriously mean it. You would be fantastic in either one of those roles. I really hope you get them."
-Ritchie Murder
-Ritchie Murder
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Concept of the Month - September 23, 2010
Double Standard
The term double standard, coined in 1912,[1] refers to any set of principles containing different provisions for one group of people than for another, typically without a good reason for having said difference.[2] A double standard may take the form of an instance in which certain applications (often of a word or phrase) are perceived as acceptable to be used by one group of people, but are considered unacceptable—taboo—when used by another group.
A double standard, thus, can be described as a sort of biased, morally unfair suspension (toward a certain group) of the principle that all are equal in their freedoms. Such double standards are seen as unjustified because they violate a basic maxim of modern legal jurisprudence: that all parties should stand equal before the law.
Example:
The term double standard, coined in 1912,[1] refers to any set of principles containing different provisions for one group of people than for another, typically without a good reason for having said difference.[2] A double standard may take the form of an instance in which certain applications (often of a word or phrase) are perceived as acceptable to be used by one group of people, but are considered unacceptable—taboo—when used by another group.
A double standard, thus, can be described as a sort of biased, morally unfair suspension (toward a certain group) of the principle that all are equal in their freedoms. Such double standards are seen as unjustified because they violate a basic maxim of modern legal jurisprudence: that all parties should stand equal before the law.
Example:
REVIEW of the KoFF: "Fearless balls out, fuck you type of performance...authentic...real."
My British friend, Guy, who I met through his famous YouTube channel TheMainMeal, which features his patented, one of a kind Tourette's Karaoke performances, paid me the ultimate compliment today.
He wants me to link my video to one of his videos. I copied his message telling me why under this video. My performance starts at 2:08.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC0vVLlHxk8
At the time of this posting, Guy's performance of R.E.M.'s Losing My Religion has been viewed 388,100 times. My video has got 25 views.
He's got Tourettes and Asperger's. I've got Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type and Asperger's.
We are real people with flaws. We are happy to wear them. And we don't give a fuck.
Warm Regards,
Erik B. Anderson
Independence Township, New Jersey
Established 1782
He wants me to link my video to one of his videos. I copied his message telling me why under this video. My performance starts at 2:08.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC0vVLlHxk8
Hi Erik
My reason for suggesting you link your video to mine, is because what I see in that video is a fearless, balls out, fuck you type of performance, I love it, its what I am about, To me the modern age is saturated with fake, plastic people, everyone thinks they are star and acts like they are already a star, replete with thoroughly offensive ego. You are real, your performance is real, the world needs reality, I don;t mean the crap thats passes for reality tv, I mean totally authentic real people who have flaws, are happy to wear them and just don't give a fuck.
You have my total respect for putting yourself out there..
take care friend
Guy
http://www.youtube.com/themainmeal
At the time of this posting, Guy's performance of R.E.M.'s Losing My Religion has been viewed 388,100 times. My video has got 25 views.
He's got Tourettes and Asperger's. I've got Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type and Asperger's.
We are real people with flaws. We are happy to wear them. And we don't give a fuck.
Warm Regards,
Erik B. Anderson
Independence Township, New Jersey
Established 1782
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)